WHO Information Notice for IVD Users/PCR test

The WHO quietly released an important news update last week.  

Basically they are openly admitting that the PCR test, advised by the WHO themselves, is as good as useless for large scale testing, the way it is done across the entire world to establish Covid numbers.

       

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I copied the entire article below in case the link is blocked

---

WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2

Date: 13 January 2021                                                                      

WHO-identifier: 2020/5, version 2

Target audience: laboratory professionals and users of IVDs.

Purpose of this notice: clarify information previously provided by WHO. This notice supersedes WHO Information Notice for In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device (IVD) Users 2020/05 version 1, issued 14 December 2020.

Description of the problem: WHO requests users to follow the instructions for use (IFU) when interpreting results for specimens tested using PCR methodology.  

Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.
WHO guidance 'Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2' states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.

Actions to be taken by IVD users:

1. Please read carefully the IFU in its entirety.
   
2. Contact your local representative if there is any aspect of the IFU that is unclear to you.
   
3. Check the IFU for each incoming consignment to detect any changes to the IFU.
   
4. Provide the Ct value in the report to the requesting health care provider.
   

Contact person for further information:
Anita SANDS, Regulation and Prequalification, World Health Organization, e-mail: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
References:
1. Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020, WHO reference number WHO/2019-nCoV/laboratory/2020.6.
2. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102.

When they talk about the corona test they always talk about doing x amount of cycles.
So I was curious about what a cycle exactly means.

Then I found out what David Icke means with, the test is not testing for a virus.

Because... the test isn't testing for a virus at all, it's a procedure for manipulating dna and amplifying the result.

They complety strip the original dna by boiling it to pieces, add some stuff, cook it up, add some more other stuff, bake some more... repeat cycle

The result is just a mixture of randomly manipulated dna.



[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Yup i kinda understood what Icke meant ages ago in those vids and
it certainly seems he was correct,most has been a big lie from the
beginning i reckon.
I still sold out and became a slave to the NWO though...i had the vaccine last week
due to worries about my circulation.

Are you sure it was one of the Covid vaccines, or just a shot of regular antibiotics?

Hopefully you had one of the good ones, not everybody dies from it, seems a bit like russian roulette at the moment.
40-50 different brands and companies conjuring up vaccines like they are making a pot of tea and baking a cake. 

Quote :

Yup i kinda understood what Icke meant ages ago in those vids and
it certainly seems he was correct,most has been a big lie from the
beginning i reckon.

By now I'm more worried about what is behind the big virus scam, why now this big push?
The globalists act and treat people as if soon it isn't going to matter anyway.